Let me say that I understand both sides. In my opinion it should not be all black and white - there is always a common ground here that can be reached.
@GAlbano76 made a proposal that makes sense - there are countless ways to not take away "the dream" from a starter trader with small capital but lets be honest here.. the system can - and is -gamed. Many strategies are going for a darwinia prize while being martingales or what not.. We must remind ourselves the basics I think.
Why darwinia exists? To bring good traders on the platform.
If the ratio of good/bad traders is improved that matters as well. Darwinex is a company not a democrasy. Darwinex needs better traders and less noise/bad strategies. Darwinex needs also better investors!
I keep seeing the "73% of investors lose money on this platform" warning. In etoro that number is in the 60s last time I saw it. Better traders and better investors are needed.
(On that note I wonder when there will be a darwinia prize for investors.
rules? of the top of my head plenty will be needed..
1) participation of investors is voluntary - you dont have to join if you dont want to
2) your portfolio results is a darwin (with all that includes..)