Following this event, I wish Darwinex will become more transparent on sharing factual information on the traders piloting Darwins. Although some assumptions can be made from analyzing the ECs and metrics, please consider to indicate after proper detection whether the underlying trader is piloting his account with an EA or without, as well as if he is using any stoplosses or none at all (like always / sometimes / never, far ones / close ones ?), even when his trading journal is protected against spying. It could be done with the likes of 2 trophies icons : EA (like on Zulu) and Stops and some tooltip when hovering mouse on top
Or anyway, think about something along those lines, to exist aside data mining.
On managed accounts by CTAs, money managers are due by regulation requirement to submit a detailed prospectus on what tactical strategy the manager is following and such kind of basic info is lacking here. This way, investors are informed at the very beginning.
The link to external websites is not enough when people don't have such websites in the first place. Imho, there needs to be more communaction samples despite - at the side of - the metrics which Darwinex is already doing a good job at.
https://darwinex.uservoice.com/forums/275129-general/suggestions/12884406-please-add-a-filter-to-define-assets-a-darwin-trad would help to ease diversification searches
When I look at USV for instance, I really believe such disaster could be avoided for backers with very simple measures. Such drop is too bad a display not to provide explanations at the root