First of all thank you for the advertising.
I would like an more complete answer then a picture of my darwins.
If you d'ont accept the critics from every one you can edit a listing of "good traders" that have the right to make comments here.
But I don't hold it against you since there are many exemples of failing communication. The last in date is the bank changement.
Keep in mind that if I wanted to damage darwinex it's very easy for me to publish all over social media.
Instead I'm expressing my opinion here. Of course what I say often isn't very documentated but all these that knows darwinx understant what I'm talking about.
Publishing the list of my darwins make me think one exemple (even it's a bit daring): when someone it's in opposition with leader of an dictatorial regime , the regime investigate to find something in his private life to discredit him.
To come to our exemple it's not normal that users discover some important changes before that darwinex annouces them.
There are other people here that were very active and not publishing any more. What might be the reason?
Perhaps they're not seeing a good developpement?
Other question is: how much darwinex can efford to loose users?
In the last case of bank change (even personally don't have any probleme) maybe the issue concerned a few poeple but the damage is far more important.
I think darwinex must hire a good communicant .
To give you an exemple that's not a wild imagining not a desire to destroy your work.
Maybe you remember this conversation that we had three wekks ago
And here darwinex account
How can you eplain that MQL5 and Myfxbook have the right charts and trades and not darwinex?
Since there I haven't had any answer from darwinex but that's not important.
I have the right to imagine that this have happend to some others that are now profitting from this.
You see that things are not so simple.
You can pin the chart of my darwins on the top so you don't have to edit any time.