I think that it is not so difficult
I can realise that the trackrecords made only in Darwinex could not be so good to attract somo type of investors, but for me they are good enough.
As an investor I don't want to trade darwins, I would like to diversificate my investments in the long term, finding providers that are compromised with theirs trackrecords/darwins, and looking for the long term. Now for different reasons it is very difficult to filter them if you don't meet personally.
If the provider is only working to get investors, not for working its equity, they don't have any incentive to continue creating a long trackrecord, when the difficulties appear with stagnations or drawdowns…. It is easy check as even good traders, close their darwins and open new to try to get the holy grails curves as it was a lottery. Others trade several accounts and incept only the good ones….
It is not only a case of incentives, because even having less market to get these compromised providers, it is very difficult to find them between the sea of migrations with incredible returns, that can confuss the investors, creating doubts and paralysis (as my case) or creating high expectatives that it will not be satisfied, and they Will sell in lows and buy in highs, and everybody lose.
But what are my expectatives? They are the same as a trader in my darwins, try to beat my other portfolio of investments in shares or pension plans in a diversified way, not less and not more. As trader of my equity, being very very difficult, I am getting it, as an investor of darwins I am not yet, and I am certain that it is my fault to not get the adequate provider for my way of investment.
I add another column to the data of yesterday to see the
real anual profitability of every dawin. It is true that to be fully correct the quote should include the divergence, buy I think that Darwinex is working in this way
Now I can compare with some of my investments in pension plans (all of them 5 stars morning star, perhaps not enough for somebody, but enough for me)
And this last that copy the SP500
The shape of the chart is not so different of the darwins "not holy grails", and the DD are between 15-20%
But the most important for me it is the correlation between all of them, and we can
diversificate in this market of darwinex, because I am certain that recessions and crisis will come back and the DD of 20% will be overcome as happened in 2000-2002 or 2008-2009, and I would like to be ready to support it with my trading and why not as investor in darwinex.
I know that darwinex is focused in trade darwins, API, … but "conventional" investors like me would like to have easier to get providers focused in this conventional way.
I don't understand that to get the real return in darwinex of the long-trackrecord, I had to check every chart and take the migration quote, and calculate the return and lengh of trackrecord without migration.
My opinion, to solve the points and improve the visibility:
1) The trackrecord migrated is hidding this type of darwins in the filters by return.
2) The returns at origin and lenght of trackrecord is a filter devaluated with the bad behaviour of a lot of darwins post-migration that are included in this filter
3) The filter of return > 50% is also completely devaluated, and it should be given only for returns in the platform
4) There is not visibility in the platform for the long trackrecords operated in Darwinex
5) There is not weight in dscore for darwin with more of 12 dperiod in Darwinex that would give more visibility
1 and 2) when we filter in "all darwins", we can order by RETURN:
If it is not possible add two new columns with the TimeFrame and Return real in Darwinex, and filter for the return you want, but if I had to choose between Return and TimeFrame total with migration and real in Darwinex, I choose real in darwinex without migrations.
3) I would only give the filter of return >50% to the trackrecord in darwinex
4 and 5) To give more visibility and create incentives to providers to create long trackrecords, and not leave them, it is necessary to act in dscore, using its influence of visibility and its weight in darwinia.
It could have several ideas, but the simpler for me is the repeated idea to créate a new IA named experience, and change the current and renamed significance.