Thanks @bigginie for your kind words here trying to criticize the dscore, and sharing a video and report, and congratulations for your results.
Thanks also because this is the way that everybody should do, not only empty words and destructive messages, because it let us clarify when your conclusions are wrong, and are creating a climate of doubts about darwinex job.
Please take my words in a constructive way, and I am going to try to help you, to know what is really happening and how Darwinex IA’s can help us to analyse very quickly darwins. Thanks Darwinex
It did not like your report. I read it because you said that was interesting, but sorry in my opinion is very superficial, trivial and wrong. Either I don’t like that you are comparing with darwins of other colleagues, trying to conclude something that is wrong and is really easy to explain, with a minimum analysis of no more than 2 minutes.
I am also really sorry because when you come here with it it seems that you are convinced that you have high knowledge of what you are explaining… If it were not, the first step would have to be to come here asking for help.
Your conclusions are: you have a very low dscore and you are not able to fight for darwinia contest. You say that is unfair comparing only with the performance of other darwins, and even criticize the speed of recovery.
You conclude that your problem is low La, and you explained that the reason is your high Cs
I am going to explain you everything:
Everybody has to understand that Darwinex created D-score to help investor to evaluate what they consider bad and good trading, not only performance.
It is like an analysis of the doctor. Perhaps results are bad, and you have to check dephtly, and at the end conclude that you will have good health, or not as show performance, or conclude that you have syntoms of a future desease…
Most of us can analyse darwins without dscore, but investors need to be protected. The problem is that always will have healthy darwins prejudiced…
Attached the evolution of dscore
Sorry to inform you that you have a problem with La, but the IA which is holding dscore low is Mc not La.
In point (1) you can see in the max score and 10 exp in Dec 18 with a dscore of more than 70, you had La very low. Then you can understand that is not La the problem…
In point (2) we check that performance pF and Mc fell down, creating minimum dscore
In point (3) pF went up again and Mc continue falling, and you claim that dscore is not recovering as other darwins…
Now you can realise that is Mc is creating the problem, and until you don’t change your style, will never recover dscore. I am sorry.
I would like to go depht with Mc and La, because if you are one of the healthy darwins you have to give explanations about it, because dscore is detecting conclusions of bad trading, always below parameters of darwinex not mine.
Although the information of trades and pairs is hidden, somebody can extract some conclusions:
Mc is going down to zero, that means that the darwin is trading in only one side of the market.
In the chart of Mc I saw that is one instrument with the 80% of weight that is ONLY LONG and last 6dperiod open a 92% of the time in the market, only reading the information.
If we read La, we find a really big negative excursión of almost 50% of losses, in an only currency pair. That’s why La is so low, no the good Cs.
This position started in may of 2019. If we do a small investigation, we could think that the pair traded is USDJPY and the Darwin is long all the time.
In my opinion, If we compare USDJPY with the Darwin, it seems to confirm that is long from may, USD and darwin started to fall, and dleverage started to increase, creating the negative excursión of 50%, after USD started to recover, and the Darwin even better because was traded with more dleverage in the darwin because Rs was going down quickly, that got that the Darwin has got a new HWM but USD not, after this effective management.
I am not judging, only Reading, is Darwinex which is qualifying this type of trading not me.
I hope that this analysis could help.