In fact the problem was a truncated explanation on the blog post that was misinterpreted.
You can read it again, one could, in fact no, it was formulated that one should deduce that an entire freedom would be given to the traders to decide when their Darwin can be invested.
Ok, it was in the context of a problem of divergence.
But the shorter an ad, the more precise it must be.
At school, I had been taught this example about a Queen's service message for execution: "Hang, not pardoned" but in fact the correct message was "Hang not, pardoned".