Not really !
It's their definitions (Promising & Good score) don't fill our expectations.
Promising: DARWINs with low experience (else if Good score), but good scores across all other Investment Attributes.
$GAG for example cause it is a punchy fact (but many others) had a low experience, it's ok, but with a 1,1/10 La, i don't see, also investors too, the good score accross ALL OTHER IA !
I could indicate the other darwins as PQH, EXG, NNX, NNP and GAG. All this darwins are promising with red loss aversion. How many are alive to the end of the year ? I will track this stategy & darwins month after month.