CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 64 % of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

Number of Darwins in DarwinIA

Hi all,

How come the All Darwins page shows 2,415 Darwins while the DarwinIA page shows 4,468?
I thought that DarwinIA leaderboard would’ve been smaller than the All Darwins list since some Darwins are excluded due to correlation with other Darwins…

Is this just a display bug?




In darwinia you have also inactive darwins, darwins that aren’t trading for 2 months.


That’s very odd (or better said: superfluous), since that ranking is being reset every month :smiley:

Shouldn’t a Darwin be included in DarwinIA only after the first trade decision made each month?
I guess here comes an additional question:

If a Darwin has only one trade open, and it has been open for more than 4 months, and there’s no other activity on that Darwin, what would be the Regularity score? 0 or 100?

0 and by the way with 0% return the Rating is 0 .
Yes it is odd but maybe ther is a reason not obvious for us.

Return would not necessarily be 0% as DarwinIA is showing floating returns too which constantly change.
But yea, if the Regularity would be 0 instead of 100, then there’s no way such a Darwin would end up in the Top 80 :slightly_smiling_face:

From The formula of the DarwinIA rating:

In order to obtain a 100% in Regularity, a DARWIN’s market exposition in the current month must reach at least its average market exposition in the previous 3 months. Market exposition for Regularity gets calculated in the same way it gets calculated for the Experience attribute.