Yes, new calculations are in place. In fact, Mc was recomputed from trade 1.
That is also the reason why I cannot give my impression on how your score has been impacted negatively or positively unfortunately, since the new infos have replaced the old ones.
The main thing to remember is: if your strategy is (much) correlated to a specific market, you will be less penalized if you outperform your benchmark - the underlying asset.
On the PGH side, since I know your strategy for a long time now, I agree on considering you a (good ) swing trader - btw, very nice performance today!
You have a score of 7.5 today on Mc attribute. So it is a nice score!
I think we'll agree on the fact that: as a swing trader you'll "follow the money" and will go where the best trending opportunity is. As a, consequence, it is normal to be more or less correlated to a specific asset on "x" period of time, then lighten exposure and rebalance on the new hypothetic opportunity elsewhere.
So in general diversified (12 periods), well distributed in term of numbers and duration, but there's some asymetry at short term (some on 6 periods, but it is more clear on the last 3 periods - GBPAUD for example ) in term of global exposure.
So my personal impression on the situation is that the Mc summarizes pretty well the behaviour of your strategy: generally well diversified, with more exposure on x or y asset from time to time to ensure the performance of the basket.
We'll see how it behaves in the future, but a rate with a data range between 6.5 and 7.5 is very realistic imo according to your methodology (and if you keep doing the same).
I'll complete my post tomorrow with some pics