CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 66 % of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

Portfolio - RF11 - RafwinSistemas

16,52%

Although it is true, you can have losses between 30% and 40% if you do not put limits

1 Like

in ICA, the loss was a little higher, 22%
although its manager goes for -40%
satisfied when meeting system
As you say you can not always win.
Yes, the DWC was difficult, I decided that it was increasingly bearish not to apply operations

2 Likes

@CavaliereVerde perdona la traduzione

1 Like

Hi all.
Ends April and updated portfolio results.
exceeding 30%

2 Likes

Congrats! Impressive!
This should be the more “buy and hold” portfolio.
Are there darwins that you are holding since the beginning?
Which ones? If you want to share at least their number…

1 Like

Right, combination of “buy and hold” “entries in DD” and “” staggered entries “, management that I put in the portfolio demo” early warning "
Some darwins I use.
NTI
EZN this darwin is mine
DZQ this darwin is mine
TZT this darwin is mine
"ONE
AQA
FEG
and as you know darwins from my watch list, like your darwin KVL

1 Like

Thanx I noticed the analysis of KVL on you blog!

Is KVL top100 top50 top25 or top10 ?

1 Like

Top 10
Waiting for my chance, it will come as you are in my reference of good darwin.
But the rules are the rules.
Congratulate him for that darwin.

1 Like

I am curious about your fundamental selection criteria.

On you blog you write about KVL that it is good that it runs on a decent equity but from your “porfolio publico.xls” I see that you operated also on darwins with very low equity like ICA XTT and VQB .

So what is you opinion about trader’s equity ?

2 Likes

Could it be translation error?
https://www.rafwinsistemas.top/blog/category/analisis/
I do not mention anything of the capital.
The web is not currently updated.
I want to give another approach to the web.

even so indicate me where I mention the capital

About that portfolio, it is undergoing a transformation.
ICA closed
XTT Closed
VQL you are right. Low equity, at the time of the investment was higher
Coming soon to close it

1 Like

“Equity del trader razonable”

1 Like

That expression is very positive within my personal qualification of darwins.
As the last comment “a very acceptable darwin”
that is, you have a very good darwin for me.
Think that in my ranking I compare darwins with different equity and that “reasonable” valuation is good.

1 Like

tell him that the analysis on the web does not reach what I want to express.
After a while those analyzes become obsolete and are not dynamic, which is my intention in a Darwinian analysis.
progressive and dynamic monitoring, time is key in the comparison within a same Darwin.
Just today I launch a channel on YouTube, to cover the same lack that a written medium can have.
I will try to add subtitles in English.
For those who are interested, I leave a link.
I open a thread for this.
Thank you and forgive the terms I use when describing your darwin.
Something is very clear to me. what is good I buy it and I will buy your darwin.
Canal RafwinSistemas

2 Likes

Hello, do you have any update on your work? It looks impressive

1 Like

“looks” being the operative word.

No Update = bad results

1 Like

Sorry for the disconnection.
I update everything shortly :guiño:

3 Likes