I am going to try to explain what is Darwinia in my opinion.
Darwinia is a MARKETING tool, and all the marketing tools try to attract GOOD CLIENTS.
It is true that a good client can be a good trader or not, and a good trader can be also a good client or not.
What do I understand that are good clients for Darwinex or every company?
A good client are those who create more incomes to the company, and mainly colaborate to pay the salaries, the invoices, all the costs, and why not to say, make profits to the company. Investors and traders come here to get profits, why not Darwinex have the right to look for profits to their shareholders?
As clients we can ask for that these incomes and profits have to be aligned with our interests. In the case of Darwinex, it is difficult to find other bussiness with the interests more aligned.
I see as an obligation, not only a right, to intervene to manage the company looking for their interest. That will be good not only for their shareholders, will be good for the employees, and all the traders and investors that have deposited a good amount of money here. Nothing to hide.
But what are the way to make incomes for darwinex? Yes, the incomes are luckily only the COMMISIONS, and while you generate more incomes / commisions you will be considered better client.
Then good clients could be traders or investors. With the investors is easier, they will be considered better clients while have more equity invested, because it will be directly proportional to the incomes/commisions generated.
To know which traders are better clients is more difficult, and we have two points of view as good clients:
1) By one hand are the incomes/commisions generated as a trader, those will be higher while the EQUITY taking in account the VAR ("equity equivalent") be higher. In this case, it could be that the good client could be a good trader or not
There are many proofs that Darwinex is searching for GOOD TRADERS in this type of GOOD CLIENTS. We can find these proofs in:
The rebates for good trading considering the dscore, and not the volume of commisions. Simply amazing
Considering dscore and % monthly return in Darwinia, not volume.
Even with the change of Darwinia, Darwinex it is not putting in a better situation to these type of good clients, they have the same improvement of 5 million and 12 position more than everybody. They have put only the same rules to everybody in terms of leverage from the equity, nobody loose their position.
2) By the other hand are the incomes/commisions that the trader generates with the investment attracted, those will be higher while the EQUITY of the investment in the trader.
Here it is the case where a good trader could be a good client or not. They will be better clients, while more investment attract.
There were not anything in Darwinia and d-score related with equity, because I think that Darwinex really thought that everybody can become a good client in terms of investment. Maybe they thought, as I always thought, that if you have less equity will be more difficult to attract investors, but now everybody can see it if we carefully analyse the data that the transparency of darwinex let. In the next post I will attach some tables and charts that demostratre that is easier to receive investment while the equity is higher.
It is not only the reliability of the market to grow with bigger investors today the investors consider the equity to invest more or less money, and good traders with higher equity, would receive more investment.